SoundHAB: FW: North Hood Canal bloom update

Vera Trainer Vera.L.Trainer at noaa.gov
Mon Aug 27 13:30:38 EDT 2007


Hello Peter
We at NWFSC can do the SEM within the next couple weeks if we can 
receive a sample.  If someone else wants to do it, that's ok, too.  
Perhaps the same group that ID'd the outer coast species should do this 
one?  We'd need assistance from someone (Rita?) in IDing the 
coccolithophorid. Sincerely, Vera Trainer

becker wrote:
> Good Morning.
>
> It would be interesting to get an SEM on the samples as the critical thing
> is not Genus and species but form. The bloom off Vancouver Island that we (
> physical oceanography community) hypothesize was the source for this bloom
> was E. huxleyi coronal form...an unusual variant. The bloom off Vancouver
> Is. in late Aug., early Sept of 2006 on La Perouse Bank was positively ID'
> with SEM as this form alone. ( see this www site for further info on
> Vancouver Is. Species ID: http://www.emidas.org/  E. huxleyi coronal
> variation)
>
> Note that on calling around to actual resident observers of Dabob and
> Quillicene bays for the last 60 years (back to 1952 anyway), no such bloom
> of E. huxleyi has ever been observed, so it is unique. ( Personal
> communications with Richard E. Burge Ph.D. retired Director of WDF&W Brinnon
> Lab and co workers who pre date him.)
>
> The  a couple of scientists in the GLOBEC group has confirmed that the late
> August west wind event (2006) was of sufficient duration and intensity to
> move coastal surface waters into and through the straits to the entrance of
> Admiralty Inlet. Event mechanisms for getting the coastal surface water into
> Hood's canal are fairly easy to propose and could be confirmed
> experimentally with surface drifters...no one has ever tried.
>  
> If indeed the 2006 bloom from Vancouver Island made it into Hood's Canal we
> may need to review the assumptions about the isolation of Hood's Canal from
> effects from oceanic waters and species. 
>
> It is also clear that a species of Vibrio long known to occupy the coastal
> waters that is toxic to shellfish at the larval stage and early setting
> stages made its way into Hood's Canal in 2006 ...and is still there...it
> also was not previously noted by observers at Brinnon over 60 years.
>
> Just how long would it take to get SEM of the Hood's Canal bloom done
> anyway?
>
>
> P Becker
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: soundhab-bounces at whoi.edu [mailto:soundhab-bounces at whoi.edu] On Behalf
> Of Jan Newton
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 2:07 PM
> To: Jack Rensel
> Cc: soundhab at whoi.edu
> Subject: Re: SoundHAB: FW: North Hood Canal bloom update
>
> Please see:
> http://www.hoodcanal.washington.edu/observations/bloom_fishkill.jsp
> for more info on this bloom.
>
> Jan
>
>   

-- 

Vera L. Trainer, Ph.D.

Program Manager

Marine Biotoxin Group

Northwest Fisheries Science Center

2725 Montlake Blvd. E.

Seattle, WA  98112 USA


(206)860-6788

(206)860-3335 FAX

vera.l.trainer at noaa.gov

www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/hab



More information about the SoundHAB mailing list