[Flex] NSF PAPPG: Using et al.

[Sheila A Clifford]

That's my interpretation - but we can't have 3-pagers until next Monday.
Best Regards,
Sheila

On 9/29/2021 12:26 PM, Jean Davis Taft wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> The APs in PO are looking for some clarification. Our understanding is 
> that et al. is never to be used in the Reference section as all 
> authors are to be listed. However, a PI may use et al. in SciENcv in 
> the products section if the list of authors is too unwieldy and the PI 
> chooses to do so. The allowed number of pages for the Bio Sketch, 
> created with SciENcv, has increased to three.
>
> Below are quotes from the PAPPG.
> Is this your interpretation as well?
>
> Thank you! Jean
>
> *Reference List*
>> Reference information is required. Each reference must include the 
>> names of all authors (in the same sequence in which they appear in 
>> the publication), the article and journal title, book title, volume 
>> number, page numbers, and year of publication. 
>
> *Biographical Sketches*
>> The PAPPG requires that publication citations "include full citation 
>> information, including (where applicable and practicable) the names 
>> of all authors..." Senior personnel that wish to include publications 
>> in the products section of the biographical sketch that include 
>> multiple authors may, at their discretion, choose to list one or more 
>> of the authors and then "et al." in lieu of including the complete 
>> listing of authors' names. See PAPPG Chapter II.C.2.f(i)(c) 
>> <https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappg20_1/pappg_2.jsp#IIC2fic> 
>> for complete coverage of the requirements for the biographical sketch.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flex maillist  -  Flex at whoi.edu
> http://mailman.whoi.edu/mailman/listinfo/flex

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.whoi.edu/pipermail/flex/attachments/20210929/6f38e187/attachment.htm