[Flex] [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: WHOI standard C&P]]

[Erin Dupuis]

Hehe, no worries Shelia.  We all know you're wicked smaaaht. :-)

As far as that C&P "new model" goes, it sounds like Anita needs the 
BiTech #s but perhaps the #s were meant to only appear on the "internal" 
tab, not the "external" tab as they do now.  Do we need to update C&Ps 
to reflect that change or make the suggestion to the Dept. Administrators?

Erin

Sheila Clifford wrote:

> Duhhhh.  I knew it was too easy, and yes, when Shirley was speaking I 
> DID know what she was talking about....but of course lost the point 
> within, oh, say 15 minutes.  Anyone need to employ a babbling fool?  
> anyone?
> ugh.
>
>
> Helen Gordon wrote:
>
>> Sheila:
>> I don't think Shirley was talking about grant numbers.
>> It is the WHOI BiTech project numbers that are the oddity.
>>
>> Grant numbers from Federal Agencies are a matter of public record. As 
>> you point out, they are available at agency websites.
>>
>> BiTech project numbers are unique to WHOI. I believe the 
>> 'confidentiality' or non-publicizing of project numbers may have to 
>> do with avoiding instances where someone charges someone else's 
>> project without permission. Similar to telephone/copy codes.
>>
>> -h
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Subject:
>> Re: [Flex] [Fwd: WHOI standard C&P]
>> From:
>> Sheila Clifford <sclifford at whoi.edu>
>> Date:
>> Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:49:36 -0500
>> To:
>> Flex at whoi.edu
>>
>> To:
>> Flex at whoi.edu
>>
>>
>> Dear All -
>> Is the confidentiality of grant numbers a concern these days?  Anyone 
>> with access to a computer can go to NSF's website and poke through 
>> awarded grants and get grant numbers.  Just wondering...
>> Cheers,
>> Sheila
>>
>> Shirley Barkley wrote:
>>
>>> Here is the C&P that I was discussing this morning at our meeting.
>>>
>>> Shirley
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: 	WHOI standard C&P
>>> Date: 	Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:28:53 -0400
>>> From: 	John Reilly <jreilly at whoi.edu>
>>> To: 	Shirley Barkley <sbarkley at whoi.edu>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Shirley,
>>>Attached is an example of the new "standard WHOI C&P report" (Consensus 
>>>of all departments , Larry and Claire).  It's not too different from our 
>>>current one, but will require some modifications.
>>>Please let all our AP's know about this change.
>>>Thanks,
>>>John
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Flex maillist  -  Flex at whoi.edu
>>>http://mailman.whoi.edu/mailman/listinfo/flex
>>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Flex maillist  -  Flex at whoi.edu
>>http://mailman.whoi.edu/mailman/listinfo/flex
>>  
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Flex maillist  -  Flex at whoi.edu
>>http://mailman.whoi.edu/mailman/listinfo/flex
>>  
>>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Flex maillist  -  Flex at whoi.edu
>http://mailman.whoi.edu/mailman/listinfo/flex
>  
>

-- 
Erin Dupuis
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Sr. Administrative Asst., IACUC Administrator, COHH Administrator
Biology Dept., MS 33, Redfield 206
Woods Hole, MA 02543
p: 508.289.3073
f: 508.457.2134 
edupuis at whoi.edu
www.whoi.edu/sites/IACUC
www.whoi.edu/science/cohh/whcohh/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.whoi.edu/pipermail/flex/attachments/20080326/7368cec3/attachment-0001.htm